Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

"The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas, edited by Eleonore Stump and her friend and former teacher Norman Kretzmann (1998), appeared almost thirty years ago. In the time since the publication of that volume, an enormous amount of research on Aquinas's thought has appeared. The time is right, then, for a redoing of that Companion volume. But because so much time has elapsed since the first Companion volume appeared, it was not feasible just to revise it and reissue it as a second edition. Instead, it was necessary to start over completely. With the exception of Eleonore Stump, all the contributors to The New Cambridge Companion to Aquinas are new and have written original papers for this volume; and even Stump's paper in the first Companion volume has been replaced by an entirely fresh essay"--

Thomas Aquinas --- Thomas, - Aquinas, Saint, - 1225?-1274 --- Scholasticism --- Philosophy, Medieval --- Thomism

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Qu'est-ce que Thomas d'Aquin a voulu faire en métaphysique ? S'il est désormais établi que sa doctrine refuse la primauté des concepts sur les choses (laquelle caractérise l'ontothéologie), la question reste posée d'une autonomie chez lui de la métaphysique par rapport à la théologie, donc de sa constitution et de sa fonction. Sa métaphysique est-elle intégrée ou bien séparée ? Dans les deux cas et pour des motifs inverses, Dieu a du mal y trouver sa juste place. Thomas, après Albert, se fraie un chemin entre une métaphysique intégrée, à la façon du courant augustinien auquel il continue d'appartenir, et une métaphysique séparée, celle de la Faculté des Arts, attirée dans l'orbite d'une réception d'Aristote conférant à la philosophie une indépendance à la fois rationnelle et institutionnelle, contre l'empire de la Faculté de théologie. Or c'est cette métaphysique séparée, qui malgré ses mésaventures (la condamnation de 1277), va vivre plusieurs renaissances. Elle donne lieu à trop d'incarnations et de commentaires, lesquelles donnent à croire que Thomas a écrit une métaphysique sans influence du christianisme, ni interactions elles-mêmes rationnelles, avec lui. Ce modèle, en fait moderne d'inspiration (et qui au XVIIe siècle calviniste va s'appeler ontologie, pour contrer la métaphysique), va refluer sur Thomas. Il fallait tout reprendre, oeuvres, concepts, thèses célèbres, et les évaluer, du double point de vue médiéviste et contemporain. Jusqu'à découvrir chez Thomas d'Aquin trois modalités de la métaphysique, qui sont autant d'articulations entre raison et foi. Ces trois modalités font miroiter toutes ses interventions et en dénouent les apparentes apories.

Metaphysics --- God --- Misotheism --- Theism --- Philosophy --- Ontology --- Philosophy of mind --- Thomas Aquinas --- Thomas d'Aquin --- Thomas van Aquino --- Thomas von Aquin --- Aquinas, Thomas --- d'Aquin, Thomas --- 2 THOMAS AQUINAS:231 --- 2 THOMAS AQUINAS:231 Godsdienst. Theologie-:-God. De Deo uno et trino:--dogmatisch--THOMAS AQUINAS --- Godsdienst. Theologie-:-God. De Deo uno et trino:--dogmatisch--THOMAS AQUINAS

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

2 BONAVENTURA --- 2 THOMAS AQUINAS:233 --- 2 JOANNES DUNS SCOTUS --- 233.5 --- 233.5 Natuur van de mens. Ziel --- Natuur van de mens. Ziel --- 2 JOANNES DUNS SCOTUS Godsdienst. Theologie--JOANNES DUNS SCOTUS --- Godsdienst. Theologie--JOANNES DUNS SCOTUS --- 2 THOMAS AQUINAS:233 Godsdienst. Theologie-:-De mens. Theologische antropologie--THOMAS AQUINAS --- Godsdienst. Theologie-:-De mens. Theologische antropologie--THOMAS AQUINAS --- 2 BONAVENTURA Godsdienst. Theologie--BONAVENTURA --- Godsdienst. Theologie--BONAVENTURA

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Providing an alternative to current Trinitarian and Christocentric approaches to dogmatics, this open access book instead centres the Augustinian and classical Reformation Law-Gospel distinction. Maarten Wisse demonstrates the viability of dogmatics based on the Law-Gospel distinction from both a historical and a systematic-theological perspective. From a historical perspective, Wisse shows that the actual use of Scripture should be understood as the interplay between a critical concern about the difference between God and the world on the one hand, and the witness to God's presence in Christ in the world on the other. From a systematic-theological perspective, the benefits of approaching dogmatics through the dynamics between Law and Gospel is exemplified by discussions of key dogmatic topics, such as the doctrine of Scripture, predestination, atonement, the Eucharist and the theology of religions. The eBook editions of this book are available open access under a CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence on bloomsburycollections.com. Open access was funded by The Protestant Theological University..

Theology --- Christian theology --- Christian Dogmatics;Reformation;Trinitarian;Christology;Soteriology;Gospel;Augustine;Peter Lombard;Thomas Aquinas;Melanchthon;Calvin;Barth;Martin Luther;Scripture;Predestination;Universalism;Socinus;John Owen --- Biblical studies --- Religion --- Christianity --- Theology, Christian --- Religion, Primitive --- Atheism --- Irreligion --- Religions --- Biblical studies. --- Religion. --- Christianity.

Choose an application

• Reference Manager
• EndNote
• RefWorks (Direct export to RefWorks)

Is the God of traditional theism logically incompatible with all the evil in the world? In his book, Is a Good God Logically Possible? (Palgrave paperback, 2019) James Sterba argues that the God of traditional theism is logically incompatible with especially the horrendous evil consequences of moral and natural evil that exists in our world. In this Special Issue in Religions, sixteen philosophers challenge Sterba’s argument and he responds to all of them.

Religion & beliefs --- moral evil --- natural evil --- Free Will Defence --- laws of nature --- miracles --- James P. Sterba --- Sterba --- problem of evil --- John Hick --- divine intervention --- rights --- James Sterba --- existence of God --- theodicies --- ethical principles --- Mackie --- Plantinga --- logical --- evidential --- evil as privation of the good --- God’s goodness --- concepts of God --- classical theism --- intervention --- permission --- deism --- compassion --- Wittgenstein --- grammar --- process philosophy --- theism --- ontological argument --- theodicy --- metaphysics --- free will defense --- Alvin Plantinga --- David Lewis --- Molinism --- Open Theism --- theological compatibilism --- Hugh McCann --- J.L. Mackie --- Thomas Aquinas --- Brian Davies --- divine obligations --- Richard Swinburne --- free will --- God --- moral --- morality --- evil --- good --- moral skepticism --- moral epistemology --- skeptical theism --- modal skepticism --- axiological skepticism --- ethics --- philosophy of religion --- horrendous evil --- incommensurate good --- optimal grace --- sanctification --- forgiveness --- Marilyn Adams --- William Hasker --- univocity thesis --- doctrine of divine transcendence --- horrendous evils --- compensatory response to the problem of evil --- Marilyn McCord Adams --- Karl Barth --- Duns Scotus --- logical argument from evil --- Mirandolian theodicy --- the sovereignty of humanity --- Dostoyevsky on evil --- relational conceptions of selfhood --- process theology --- process theodicy --- Charles Hartshorne --- n/a --- God's goodness